Catalytic reactor engineering ⇒ information-driven design of packed (operando), fluidized, multi-functional, and -phase reactors

Problem statement

At lab-scale, the ultimate goal of a catalytic reactor is to provide (1) reliable kinetic information, neglecting or controlling other phenomena (heat-mass transfer and hydrodynamics); (2) high-throughput data to amplify the results, accelerate model and catalyst discoveries; and (3) results with the minimum requirements of reactants and wastes generated. The pillars of these reactors are quality, quantity, and safety.

We design, build and test different laboratory-scale reactors. Our strategy involves creating and testing reactor prototypes while modeling these using our workflow. We have high-speed cameras, probes, and other measuring instruments to understand the reactor behavior. We focus on packed-, fluidized-bed, and multiphase reactors:

In packed bed reactors, we focus on forced dynamic and operando reactors. These are the quintessence of information-driven reactors where the dynamics can involve flow changes, temperature, pressure, partial pressure, presence of activity modifiers (poissons, H2O…). In operando reactors, we follow a spectro-kinetic-deactivation-hydrodynamic approach to resolve the individual steps involved. In fluidized bed reactors, we focus on downers and multifunctional reactors (circulating, multizone or two-zone, Berty reactors) We focus on trickle-bed, slurry, and bio-electrochemical reactors in multiphase bed reactors.

Al pilot-plant scale, we aim to reach the maximum productivity levels while solving the growing pains: the scale-up. Based on a robust kinetic model obtained in the intrinsic kinetic reactor (lab-scale) and using computational fluid dynamics, we design, build, and operate pilot plants. At this stage, we seek partnerships with investment or industrial enterprises to make these pilot plants.

Goals

  • Multifunctional fluidized bed reactors ⇒ multizone, circulating...
  • Packed bed membrane reactors
  • Forced dynamic reactors ⇒ pulsing, SSITKA...
  • Forced dynamic operando reactors ⇒ DRIFTS, TPSR...
  • Operando reactors
  • Spray fluidized bed reactors
  • Downer reactor I ⇒ micro downer
  • Downer reactor II ⇒ counter-current and scale-up
  • Batch Berty reactor ⇒ short contact time
  • Multiphase reactors ⇒ trickle bed and slurry
  • High throughput experimentation (HTE) reactors
  • Photo-thermal and bioreactors
  • Reactor visualization and prototyping lab
  • Spatio-temporal hydrodynamic characterization and validation

Related People

Related Publications

Thermochemical CO2 Reduction Catalyzed by Homometallic and Heterometallic Nanoparticles Generated from the Thermolysis of Supramolecularly Assembled Porous Metal-Adenine Precursors

by Pascual-Colino, Virpurwala, Mena-Gutiérrez, Perez-Yanez, Luque, Beobide, Velisoju, Castaño, Castillo
Inorg. Chem. Year: 2023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c02830

Abstract

A family of unprecedented supramolecularly assembled porous metal–organic compounds (SMOFs), based on [Cu6M(μ-adeninato)6(μ3-OH)6(μ-H2O)6]2+ cations (MII: Cu, Co, Ni, and Zn) and different dicarboxylate anions (fumarate, benzoate, and naphthalene-2,6-dicarboxylate), have been employed as precursors of catalysts for the thermocatalytic reduction of CO2. The selected metal–organic cation allows us to tune the composition of the SMOFs and, therefore, the features and performance of the final homometallic and bimetallic catalysts. These catalysts were obtained by thermolysis at 600 °C under a N2 atmosphere and consist of big metal particles (10–20 μm) placed on the surface of the carbonaceous matrix and very tiny metal aggregates (<10 nm) within this carbonaceous matrix. The latter are the most active catalytic sites for the CO2 thermocatalytic reduction. The amount of this carbonaceous matrix correlates with the organic content present in the metal–organic precursor. In this sense, CO2 thermocatalytic reduction experiments performed over the homometallic, copper only, catalysts with different carbon contents indicate that above a certain value, the increase of the carbonaceous matrix reduces the overall performance by encapsulating the nanoparticles within this matrix and isolating them from interacting with CO2. In fact, the best performing homometallic catalyst is that obtained from the precursor containing a small fumarate counterion. On the other hand, the structural features of these precursors also provide a facile route to work with a solid solution of nanoparticles as many of these metal–organic compounds can replace up to 1/7 of the copper atoms by zinc, cobalt, or nickel. Among these heterometallic catalysts, the best performing one is that of copper and zinc, which provides the higher conversion and selectivity toward CO. XPS spectroscopy and EDX mappings of the latter catalyst clearly indicate the presence of Cu1–xZnx nanoparticles covered by small ZnO aggregates that provide a better CO2 adsorption and easier CO release sites.

Keywords

CRE CO2